Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's Record: Promise and Puzzlement
Club for Growth ^ | August 21, 2007 | Club for Growth

Posted on 08/21/2007 1:15:02 PM PDT by Plutarch

Mitt Romney's Record on Economic Issues

Club for Growth Releases Fifth Presidential White Paper
Romney's Record: Promise and Puzzlement

Washington - Today, the Club for Growth released its presidential white paper on Republican presidential candidate Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (see PDF or HTML). The fifth in a series of white papers on the pro-growth records of presidential candidates, the attached report provides an extensive summary of Mitt Romney’s economic record from his unsuccessful run for the U.S. Senate to his single term as governor of Massachusetts.

"Governor Romney's economic record contains a mixture of pro-growth accomplishments and some troublesome positions that beg to be explained," said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. "While his record on taxes, spending, and entitlement reform is flawed, it is, on balance, encouraging, especially given the liberal Massachusetts Legislature. His record on trade, school choice, regulations and tort reform all indicate a strong respect for the power of market solutions. At the same time, Governor Romney's history is marked by statements at odds with his gubernatorial record and his campaign rhetoric."

Romney's strident opposition to the flat tax; his refusal to endorse the Bush tax cuts in 2003; his support for various minor tax hikes; and his once-radically bad views on campaign finance reform all cast some doubts on the extent and durability of his commitment to limited-government, pro-growth policies. His landmark steps in the healthcare arena also exhibit a mixture of desirable pro-free market efforts combined with a regrettable willingness to accept, if not embrace, a massive new regulatory regime.

"While Governor Romney still needs to explain some of his past positions," Mr. Toomey continued, "given his overall record as governor and the strong pro-growth positions he has taken on the campaign trail, we are reasonably optimistic that, as President, Mitt Romney would generally advocate a pro-growth agenda."



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; romney

1 posted on 08/21/2007 1:15:04 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Compare that to: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1884238/posts
2 posted on 08/21/2007 1:21:20 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

I wonder if Mitt would carry Massachusetts in the general election?


3 posted on 08/21/2007 1:33:23 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle; Reaganesque
I wonder if Mitt would carry Massachusetts in the general election?

Uh....no. The 2004 result was:

Bush 1,071,109 ... Kerry 1,803,800

Romney could probably do better than Bush, but 730,000 votes is a lot to make up.

4 posted on 08/21/2007 1:43:49 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
and the strong pro-growth positions he has taken on the campaign trail, we are reasonably optimistic that, as President, Mitt Romney would generally advocate a pro-growth agenda."

The meaning of these statements, reads like trying to catch a moth in a dark room.

5 posted on 08/21/2007 1:52:25 PM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

He was opposed to the Presidents 2003 tax cuts? woooo, that does it for me......no support here.


6 posted on 08/21/2007 2:09:51 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
>>>>>"Governor Romney's economic record contains a mixture of pro-growth accomplishments and some troublesome positions that beg to be explained,"

The most obvious trouble for Mitt Romney is explaining what is called, RomneyCare. RomneyCare is big liberal government-forced healthcare insurance system, that includes mandates for individuals & employers, minimum coverage requirements, subsidized insurance for the poor & government enforced fines for noncompliance. RomneyCare is reliant on federal funds. Estimate of $150-million in cost overruns expected for 2007. There is no real reform in RomneyCare. It even allows for taxpayer funded abortions. Imposes criminal sanctions on individuals and obligations on businesses. This results in government guaranteeing healthcare as a virtual right. In the end RomneyCare will not only be expensive but a perscription for more government spending and more government intrusion.

7 posted on 08/21/2007 2:22:48 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

That’s so strange...good enough to be governor, but not president? That just shows how state and local governments aren’t as valued as the federal government.


8 posted on 08/21/2007 2:41:29 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Wow - how soon people forget.

Let me reprise: Massachusetts politician = northeast, lefty, gun-grabbin, lying, tax-raising, baby-killing, criminal coddling scumbag.

Mass used to be a great place to live. That ended about the time The Hero Of Chappaquiddick first got elected to the senate.

Hey, I’m not bitter...


9 posted on 08/21/2007 2:56:36 PM PDT by Peet (Insert clever phrase here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
and his once-radically bad views on campaign finance reform

Yet another Romney flip-flop. Today Romney bashes McCain and Thompson for supporting McCain-Feingold years ago, but at the time Mitt was pushing an even more anti-free speech, anti-Constitutional plan for campaign finance.

10 posted on 08/21/2007 4:53:11 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Probably the only person who could beat Kerry in MA would be Teddy K. Hillary won’t do that well and Romney would likely do better than Bush as well. However 730,000 is indeed a lot to overcome.


11 posted on 08/21/2007 8:10:59 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson